Step-by-step explanation:
The paragraph suggests that the financing provided by the organic and natural products industries enables activists to create and promote unfounded fears about health, safety, and the environment regarding non-organic foods and modern molecular genetic engineering techniques. The use of the term "spurious" indicates that these fears are false or baseless.
The paragraph goes on to note the irony that the organic industry, which is marketed as a more environmentally friendly alternative to conventional agriculture, is actually more harmful to the environment. This implies that the fears stoked by activists may be unfounded and misguided.
Overall, the paragraph suggests that activists use funding from the organic and natural products industries to create fear and uncertainty around non-organic foods and modern agricultural practices. However, it also challenges the notion that organic farming is inherently better for the environment, suggesting that this belief may be based on false assumptions.