Step-by-step explanation:
The article titled "Should We Stop Admiring Works of Art That Were Created by Bad People?" discusses the ethical implications of appreciating art created by individuals who have committed morally reprehensible acts. The article delves into the ongoing debate surrounding whether we should separate an artist's personal life from their work. The author argues that while we should not condone the actions of artists who have done wrong, we should still appreciate their works as they have "cultural and historical significance." The article concludes by stating that "We have to learn to live with moral ambiguity."
I agree with the statement by the author that we should not judge the whole of an artist only by the immoral part of their lives. While it is essential to acknowledge the reprehensible actions of these individuals, it is equally important to appreciate their artistic contributions. The work of art should be evaluated independently of the artist's personal life. An artist's work has a cultural and historical significance beyond their personal lives. It is not fair to dismiss their entire oeuvre because of their immoral behavior. As the article rightly states, we must learn to live with moral ambiguity and recognize that people are not entirely good or bad. Therefore, we should not let the actions of the artist overshadow their artistic contributions.