67.3k views
4 votes
Read the paragraph.

I have been a nurse for twenty years. In that time, I have seen a great number of patients suffer because they did
not have health insurance. For example, I once saw a person who broke their hand in an accident. Because they
could not afford treatment, they delayed coming to the hospital and developed a serious infection. By the time I
saw them for the first time, the infection could be treated but there was a high risk of permanent disability. This
sort of thing should not happen to anyone. A strong universal health care system could prevent instances like
this from occurring.
Which of the following additions would make the paragraph more objective and effective?
the use of facts and statistics to support the anecdote
the use of more subjective words like "worst" and "best"
O the use of another anecdote about a palient"
the use of more figurative language when relating the anecdote

User Pypypy
by
8.0k points

2 Answers

7 votes

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

User Kentor
by
7.8k points
5 votes

Answer:

The use of facts and statistics to support the anecdote would make the paragraph more objective and effective. This would add credibility to the argument that a strong universal health care system is needed to prevent instances like the one described in the anecdote. Additionally, statistics can provide a broader context and help readers understand the scope of the issue.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Jacob Kranz
by
8.3k points