39.6k views
2 votes
Review the scenario.

Karen is writing an argument essay in which she proposes that a school budget surplus be spent on upgrading the equipment in the school computer lab. The opposition believes that the money should be spent on textbooks instead.

Which concession will demonstrate that Karen is a reasonable person who values and acknowledges the opposing view?

Responses

Last week, you recommended spending the budget surplus on new textbooks.

Last week, you recommended spending the budget surplus on new textbooks.

To those who oppose my viewpoint, I say that textbooks are outdated, old-fashioned, wasteful, and impractical when compared to laptops and tablets.

To those who oppose my viewpoint, I say that textbooks are outdated, old-fashioned, wasteful, and impractical when compared to laptops and tablets.

Some may think that the extra money should be spent on other things.

Some may think that the extra money should be spent on other things.

I agree that textbooks are important and useful.

I agree that textbooks are important and useful.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

The concession that will demonstrate that Karen is a reasonable person who values and acknowledges the opposing view is "I agree that textbooks are important and useful."

Step-by-step explanation:

This concession acknowledges the opposing viewpoint that the budget surplus should be spent on textbooks. By agreeing that textbooks are important and useful, Karen demonstrates that she values the opposing view and is willing to consider it. This concession shows that Karen is a reasonable person who is willing to engage in a productive debate and is open to finding a compromise that benefits both sides. It also highlights that Karen is not dismissive of the opposing view, but rather recognizes its value and importance. By acknowledging the value of textbooks, Karen can then go on to argue why upgrading the equipment in the school computer lab is the better choice for the budget surplus.

User Karl Brown
by
8.1k points