163k views
1 vote
Argue to show why certain thinkers insist on the elimination of the reality of causes. Use four (4) practical scenarios to support your argument. Your response should be between 500 to 600 words.

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Some philosophers reject the concept of causality because they believe that it is not possible to prove that one event causes another. They argue that we can only observe that one event follows another, but we cannot prove that the first event caused the second event. They also argue that the concept of causality is based on our experience of the world, and that it is not necessarily a fundamental aspect of reality.

Here are four practical scenarios that support this argument:

1. A person takes a painkiller and their headache goes away. We assume that the painkiller caused the headache to go away, but we cannot prove it. It is possible that the headache would have gone away on its own, or that something else caused the headache to go away.

2. A person eats a sandwich and then gets sick. We assume that the sandwich caused the person to get sick, but we cannot prove it. It is possible that the person would have gotten sick anyway, or that something else caused the person to get sick.

3. A person studies for a test and gets a good grade. We assume that studying caused the person to get a good grade, but we cannot prove it. It is possible that the person would have gotten a good grade anyway, or that something else caused the person to get a good grade.

4. A person exercises and loses weight. We assume that exercising caused the person to lose weight, but we cannot prove it. It is possible that the person would have lost weight anyway, or that something else caused the person to lose weight.

I hope this helps!

User Paul Karam
by
7.7k points