Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on paragraph 2, the text implies that human habitats and animal habitats/wildlife should co-exist in a way that minimizes harm to both. The author discusses the importance of preserving wildlife habitats and ecosystems, as well as the need for responsible urban development.
One example from the text that supports this idea is the mention of urban areas providing wildlife corridors and green spaces to connect fragmented habitats. This demonstrates a recognition that even in urban areas, it is important to consider the needs of wildlife and to provide spaces for them to thrive.
Two examples of my own that support the idea of co-existence between human and animal habitats are:
National Parks: National Parks are areas set aside for the protection and preservation of natural environments, including wildlife habitats. These areas provide opportunities for humans to enjoy nature while also protecting the habitats of various species.
Sustainable Agriculture: Many farmers are adopting sustainable agricultural practices that prioritize the health of the soil, water, and ecosystems. These practices can help to minimize harm to wildlife habitats and can even create habitats for beneficial species such as pollinators.
Overall, it is important to find ways for human habitats and animal habitats/wildlife to co-exist in a way that supports the health and well-being of both. This can be achieved through responsible urban development, the creation of wildlife corridors and green spaces, and sustainable agricultural practices, among other strategies.