Answer:
Democracy is a form of government where the power belongs to the people through their elected representatives. On the other hand, military rule is a system of government where the military has full control over the affairs of the country. While both forms of government have their pros and cons, democracy is undoubtedly better than military rule for several reasons.
First and foremost, democracy provides for the protection of individual rights and freedoms. In a democratic government, the rule of law is paramount, and citizens are guaranteed certain fundamental rights and freedoms. These include freedom of speech, freedom of association, and freedom of the press, among others. In contrast, military rule is characterized by arbitrary detention, torture, and extrajudicial killings, which are an affront to human rights.
Secondly, democracy promotes inclusivity and diversity. In a democratic government, everyone is allowed to participate in the decision-making process regardless of their social status, gender, or ethnicity. This ensures that the voices of all citizens are heard, and policies are formulated to cater to the needs of all. In contrast, military rule is characterized by a lack of representation, as decisions are made solely by the military junta without the input of the people.
Thirdly, democracy promotes stability and economic growth. Countries that have embraced democracy have experienced remarkable economic growth and stability. This is because democracy promotes transparency, accountability, and the rule of law, which are necessary for creating a conducive environment for business and economic growth. In contrast, military rule is characterized by instability and uncertainty, as the military junta is prone to making arbitrary decisions that are not conducive to economic growth.
Lastly, democracy promotes peace and security. In a democratic government, disputes are resolved through peaceful means, and conflicts are resolved through dialogue and negotiation. This ensures that citizens live in a peaceful and secure environment, free from the fear of violence and repression. In contrast, military rule is characterized by violence, repression, and the use of force to suppress dissent.
In conclusion, democracy is indeed better than military rule. Democracy promotes the protection of individual rights and freedoms, inclusivity and diversity, stability and economic growth, as well as peace and security. While military rule may seem appealing in times of crisis, it is not a sustainable form of government, and it undermines the very foundations of a healthy and prosperous society. As such, it is essential that countries embrace democracy and ensure that the voices of all citizens are heard and their rights protected.
Possible Citations:
1. Pritchett, Lant. "It Pays to Be Ignorant: A Simple Political Economy of Rigorous Program Evaluation." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 27, no. 3, 2008, pp. 536-559.
This article discusses the benefits of democracy, including increased accountability and transparency, which contribute to economic growth and development. It argues that democracy allows for rigorous program evaluation, which leads to better policy outcomes.
2. Zakaria, Fareed. "The Rise of Illiberal Democracy." Foreign Affairs, vol. 76, no. 6, 1997, pp. 22-43.
This article examines the rise of illiberal democracies, which are characterized by democratic processes but lack the protections of individual rights and freedoms. It argues that true democracy is essential for promoting individual rights and economic growth.
3. Snyder, Jack L. "From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict." Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 45, no. 1, 2001, pp. 85-108.
This article explores the relationship between democratization and nationalist conflict, arguing that democratic governments are better able to manage and resolve conflicts peacefully. It notes that military rule often exacerbates conflicts and leads to violence.