Question

Ain’t I woman?

Then that little man in black there, he says women can’t have as much rights as men, ‘cause Christ wasn’t a woman! Where did your Christ come from? From God and a woman! Man had nothing to do with Him.
Truth presents counter-argument in which she opposes the claims of the “man over there “. What are his claims? What logical appeal does she present to counter him?

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The man in black that Truth is referring to is likely arguing that women cannot have the same rights as men because they are not equal to men in the eyes of God. He may be using religious beliefs to justify the inferior treatment of women.

Truth counters his argument by pointing out that Christ, who is central to the man's religious beliefs, was actually born of a woman and that man had nothing to do with his creation. In doing so, she is essentially presenting a logical appeal based on the idea that if God chose to bring his son into the world through a woman, then women must have some inherent value and importance in the eyes of God.

By making this argument, Truth is challenging the notion that women are somehow less valuable or less deserving of rights than men. She is using a logical appeal based on the man's own religious beliefs to support her case for women's rights and equality.