Question

Source 3: "Munson Report" by Curtis B. Manson This is a government investigation report on Japanese Loyalty in America done in November 1941 (before Pearl Harbor happened) There is no Japanese problem on the Coast. There will be no armed uprising of Japanese. There will undoubtedly be some sabotage financed by Japan and execated largely by imported agents in each Naval District there are about 250 to 300 under surveillance. It is easy to get on the suspect list, merely a spee in favor of Japan at some banquet being sufficient to land one there. The Intelligence Services with the title of suspect and are taking no chances, Privately, they believe that only 60 in each district can be classed as really dangerous. The Japanese are hampered as saboteurs because of their easily recognized physical appearance. It will be hard for them to get near anything to blow up if it is guarded. There is far more danger from Communists and people of the Bridges type on the Coast than there is from Japanese. The Japanese here is almost exclusively a farmer, a fisherman or a small businessman. He has no entree to plants or intricate machinery." Question 1: What does the Munson Report find/conclude? or​

Answer 1

The Munson Report concludes that there is no Japanese problem on the West Coast and that there will be no armed uprising of Japanese. It suggests that there may be some sabotage financed by Japan and executed largely by imported agents, but that only a small number of Japanese individuals (about 60 in each district) can be classed as really dangerous. The report also notes that the Japanese in America are hampered as saboteurs due to their easily recognized physical appearance and that there is far more danger from Communists and people of the Bridges type on the Coast than there is from Japanese. The Japanese in America are almost exclusively farmers, fishermen, or small business owners, and they have no entree to plants or intricate machinery.