174k views
0 votes
discuss how Filkins felt about the American withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan. Looking at the information in the articles about women (Today in Afghanistan page), do you think he was right?

User MikeKulls
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Historical examples such as Vietnam and Somalia suggest a pattern of U.S. intervention followed by withdrawals that leave complex legacies, including effects on local populations and women's rights. Filkins' view on the withdrawal from Afghanistan likely recognizes these multifaceted consequences.

Step-by-step explanation:

The discussion of Filkins' views on the American withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan is intertwined with historical perspectives on U.S. military involvements such as Vietnam and Somalia. The various excerpts suggest a pattern of American intervention and withdrawal from foreign conflicts, often leaving behind unresolved issues and a questioned credibility of U.S. foreign policy objectives. Regarding the situation of women in Afghanistan, the provided texts do not directly address Filkins' perspective on gender issues post-withdrawal. However, broader implications underscore that abrupt troop withdrawals, as seen from historical examples, can have lasting consequences on local populations, including potentially reversing gains made by women's rights initiatives.

In Vietnam, withdrawal and the revelation of deliberate misinformation led to a credibility gap and a change in public opinion. Similarly, the withdrawal from Somalia may have missed an opportunity to foster goodwill, with a hasty departure having potential implications for local stability and perceptions of U.S. commitment. As for Afghanistan, hindsight suggests that the American involvement was more complex, with both strategic goals and human rights considerations, such as the advancement of women, being part of the narrative.

User William Entriken
by
7.9k points