Question

When reasoning analogically, you infer that

O what is true in one case will also be true in a similar case.
4
a causal relationship can be established between two or more events.
O a general principle is validated by a question of fact.
O a specific conclusion is true because it is verified by a general principle-
O your position is true because it is demonstrated by statistical trends.

Answer 1

Analogical reasoning suggests that what is true in one case will be true in a similar case. It is a form of inductive reasoning that, while useful, does not guarantee the truth and requires empirical validation. The correct answer is option 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

When reasoning analogically, you infer that what is true in one case will also be true in a similar case. This type of reasoning is related to inductive reasoning, where one makes inferences based on patterns observed in specific instances. It is important to note that while analogical reasoning can be persuasive, it does not guarantee the truth, as inductive inferences may lead to probably true conclusions rather than definitively true conclusions.

In the context of scientific method, for example, inductive reasoning is used to establish patterns and generalizations which may be tested by deductive reasoning. A hypothesis formed using inductive reasoning from observed data then becomes a basis for further testing. However, if the initial generalization is incorrect, the specific conclusion derived from it will also likely be incorrect.

Therefore, while analogical reasoning is a useful tool in forming hypotheses and guiding investigation, one must corroborate such reasoning with empirical evidence to validate the conclusions reached.