98.8k views
5 votes
There is no other natural wealth so important to humans as the forests.

In the larger use of forests is included their effect on rainfall. It is believed that clouds, passing over the damp, cool air that rises from a forest, are more likely to form water drops and fall as rain. So, we can establish that a country that is well wooded will have a larger rainfall than the one that has fewer trees.
Twenty-five years ago, Kansas was a state with few trees. The almost-dry plains extended half-way across the state. Now thousands of acres of trees have been planted, and crops have been cultivated, and the more forests and crops the farmers plant, the more rain comes to water them.
The hot winds, which could undo a whole season's hard work in a day, are seldom heard of now. Kansas is no longer considered a dry region, but it is the most cultivated region in the country. This has come, not by dry farming, but by the cultivation of the soil and by the planting of trees.
Though rainfall increases, water does not overflow, for the leaves on the ground in the forests hold the water as in a vast sponge. They keep the waters in check and distribute the rainfall gently and evenly on the lands below. Forests, thus, prevent the wearing away of the hillsides and balance the water supply of rivers.
Trees supply us with food and medicine, and the greatest of all their direct uses, they furnish lumber for all kinds of manufacturing.
We must understand what the loss of forests would mean to us. It would cause an imbalance of water or the gradual drying up of our streams. It would mean that the manufacture of wooden articles would practically cease. The thousand conveniences we enjoy as a matter of course would become rare and costly. This is why we must appreciate our forests and all these things we gain from having them!
2
Which sentence from the passage best supports the idea that the destruction of forests will have a huge impact on the supply of lumber?
A.
We must understand what the loss of forests would mean to us.
B.
The hot winds, which could undo a whole season's hard work in a day, are seldom heard of now.
C.
It would mean that the manufacture of wooden articles would practically cease.
D.
Forests, thus, prevent the wearing away of the hillsides and balance the water supply of rivers.
Reset Submit

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The sentence "It would mean that the manufacture of wooden articles would practically cease." from the passage best supports the impact of deforestation on lumber supply. The correct answer is option C.

Step-by-step explanation:

The sentence from the passage that best supports the idea that the destruction of forests will have a huge impact on the supply of lumber is "It would mean that the manufacture of wooden articles would practically cease." This sentence directly connects the destruction of forests with the cessation of wood-based manufacturing, implying a significant impact on the availability of lumber for various uses.

Deforestation not only threatens the supply of lumber, which is vital for construction and manufacturing but also disrupts the water cycle and reduces biodiversity. The ecological role of forests, such as hydrologic regulation and carbon sequestration, is critical, and their loss can result in increased natural disasters, such as floods and tsunamis, and negative effects on climate and agriculture.

User Eudore
by
9.2k points