Final answer:
Nationalism acted as a double-edged sword for Napoleon; it legitimized his early rule but eventually contributed to the fall of his empire as occupied territories sought independence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Was Nationalism Positive or Negative for Napoleon?
Nationalism was both a positive and negative force for Napoleon during his time as emperor. Initially, Napoleon used nationalist sentiment to gain the support of the French people. He was seen as a reformer who exported the values of the French Revolution across Europe, undercutting traditional nobility and promoting legal equality. This helped him build a massive empire and become a national hero.
However, the tide of nationalism also became a detrimental force. Napoleon's expansionist policies and the plundering of occupied territories sowed seeds of resentment. His decisions, particularly the disastrous invasion of Russia, revealed his vulnerabilities and spurred nationalist feelings in the occupied regions. In turn, these regions began to see themselves as distinct nations, undermining the unity of his empire.
Ultimately, Napoleon's inability to stop pursuing more victories led to overextension and military defeat. His empire crumbled as nationalism within occupied territories contributed to their desire for independence, marking the end of his rule and the commencement of national identities that challenged the very concept of empire.