Final answer:
Closed-skill tests are easier to control and standardize than open-skill tests due to the predictable conditions of the activities they assess, such as in a controlled indoor environment for a free throw in basketball.
Step-by-step explanation:
Tests for closed-skill activities are generally easier to control and standardize compared to open-skill tests. Closed-skill activities are stable and predictable, occurring in stable environments where conditions don't change. Examples include a free throw in basketball or a golf swing. Contrarily, open-skill activities involve dynamic, unpredictable settings, like playing soccer or driving in traffic, where conditions constantly change and are less controllable.
The ease of standardization in closed-skill tests is because the environment can be controlled, and performance can be replicated under the same conditions. This makes it simpler to create a consistent measuring tool. For instance, when assessing a free throw, factors like the distance from the hoop, the type of ball, and the indoor environment can be standardized. This is not as easy with open-skill activities, where external factors and interactions cannot be easily controlled or predicted, making standardization a challenge.