Final answer:
Polly does NOT use the fallacy of diversion against the narrator, as this involves distracting the audience from the main argument, which is not indicated in the provided text.
Step-by-step explanation:
To ascertain which fallacies Polly does NOT use against the narrator, one must first understand the common fallacies. After reviewing the information, it becomes clear that Polly does not use the fallacy of diversion. This fallacy involves attempts to distract the audience from the argument by bringing up something else, changing the subject to prevent resolution of the issue at hand. However, the text does not indicate Polly engaging in this tactic against the narrator.
In the context provided, other fallacies mentioned include an appeal to emotion, where one attempts to manipulate an audience's feelings rather than present a logical argument, and a spurious connection, which is making a connection between two unrelated things.
Based on the excerpt mentioning an unfair judgment based on gender or a lack of narrative objectivity, these may be indicative of other fallacies used. Nonetheless, the fallacy of diversion is not employed by Polly against the narrator as there is no evidence of any attempt to redirect the conversation or argument.