Final answer:
The League of Nations was founded with noble goals for global security and preventing wars but proved ineffective due to its lack of enforcement power and absence of key nations such as the United States. It was a precursor to the United Nations, which sought to address the shortcomings of the League.
Step-by-step explanation:
The League of Nations was an international organization established after World War I by the Treaty of Versailles, aimed at promoting global security and achieving the goal of collective security. Despite Woodrow Wilson's vision, the League had significant limitations, such as not having a military force to enforce its resolutions, and requiring unanimous agreement to take action, which led to its ineffectiveness in preventing the aggression that eventually culminated in World War II.
Critics argue that the United States' decision to stay out of the League hampered its potential effectiveness, while others might contend that the focus on national interests by European nations following the war was a natural response to their experiences during the conflict.
In my opinion, the idea behind the League of Nations was well-intentioned, aiming to prevent future wars through collective action and mutual defense agreements. However, in practice, it was a bad idea due to the League's lack of enforcement power and the absence of key nations like the United States.
While it was visionary, the League's inability to manage international crises demonstrated the need for a more robust system, leading to the establishment of the United Nations after World War II, which was designed to overcome some of these issues with features like non-unanimous decision-making processes.