Final answer:
The statement reflects the media's tendency to value sensational stories about the wealthy over significant issues affecting the poor, a choice that can have severe implications for society and democracy. Christiane Amanpour's regret over inadequate coverage of the Rwandan genocide illustrates this dilemma. Moreover, the spread of misinformation in new media further challenges the integrity of journalistic practices.
Step-by-step explanation:
Media's Impact on Society
The observation by Mokokoma Mokhonoana implicates the media in valuing the lives of the wealthy and notable over those of the many poor, suggesting a sensationalist and hierarchical dissemination of news. When journalists, who are supposed to act as agents of reform, prioritize certain stories over others, it can lead to significant negative consequences, such as the lack of coverage of the Rwandan genocide in 1994. An example of this failure is highlighted by journalist Christiane Amanpour, who admits that media's engagement with triviality can undermine democracy. The death of a billionaire brings a lot of media attention and provides ground for sensationalism, which is often more sellable than covering lives of countless poor individuals.
Billionaires seeking to make a lasting impact on society are often highlighted by the media, whether their ventures are successful, like those aiming for space exploration, or those that attempt to create a sustainable future for humanity. Another instance where financial prowess overshadowed major societal issues was the sports event in Zaire, which drew media attention for its celebration of Black Power and distraction from political issues under Mobutu's rule. These examples show a consistent pattern in the value attributed by media to wealth and influence over common welfare.
Media distortion and the proliferation of false information are also critical issues within new media platforms, causing misrepresentations and contributing to the public's mistrust. The circulation of incorrect stories, like the exaggerated costs of President Obama's visit to India, only highlights the sometimes irresponsible practices within journalism.