Final answer:
The provided information does not include details about Swan Necklace. Instead, it discusses various historical figures who supported their causes in different conflicts, which can offer perspective on why an individual might assist a certain party in wartime.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Red Coats, or British soldiers, were not directly mentioned as being helped by someone named Swan Necklace in the supplied excerpts. The excerpts do not provide any information about an individual or entity by that name. However, they do discuss various historical characters and their actions during times of conflict.
For example, one excerpt highlights how Mary Fish Silliman played a role in the revolutionary period by working to negotiate the release of her husband from Loyalist capture. In another, women are mentioned for their contributions to the war effort, including making surgical dressings and knitting for the soldiers.
Such examples illustrate the lengths individuals have gone to support their causes throughout history, which may explain why someone might decide to help a particular side in a conflict. Support could come in many forms, such as aiding in prisoner exchange negotiations, like Mary Silliman, or contributing to the war effort through medical and logistical support, as seen in other examples.
It is essential to investigate specific historical contexts to understand the motivations behind individuals supporting one side over another in a conflict. In the absence of concise details about Swan Necklace and their decisions, one can only speculate based on the general understanding of human behavior in wartime circumstances. The broader theme suggests that personal experiences, loyalty, a sense of duty, or strategic gains could be reasons behind such actions.