Final answer:
Increased calls for voting system overhaul in 2004 compared to 2000 were likely due to recognized system imperfections. HAVA 2002 aimed to address issues from the 2000 election, but widespread changes were slowed by cost and state-level differences.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Calls to overhaul the nation's voting system were even greater in 2004 than they were in 2000' can be considered true or false based on differing perspectives. However, after the 2000 election in Florida, which revealed inconsistencies and imprecisions in voting, such as the infamous "butterfly ballot" and debates around hanging and pregnant chads, calls for reform were certainly loud.
This culminated in the passing of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002. HAVA aimed to address issues like unclear ballots, mechanical voting machines' unreliability, and outdated punch-card systems. Nonetheless, real, widespread systematic change was slow due to factors like cost and varying state policies.
By 2004, any increased demand for overhaul was likely driven by ongoing imperfections in the system rather than a bigger outcry compared to the 2000 election aftermath.