180k views
4 votes
Two factors reduce the effectiveness of a president's cabinet. One is because cabinet members have two or three constituencies that require loyalty; and the other is the problem with maintaining "secrecy." Explain why presidents have had this problem with "secrecy."

User Tenobaal
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Presidents struggle with cabinet member loyalty and secrecy due to the size of the bureaucracy and the autonomy of cabinet members who may have diverging interests. Maintaining secrecy is challenging in a complex executive structure where many unelected officials interact with external entities, potentially leading to information leaks. Cabinet members' effectiveness can be compromised by their various loyalties and the difficulty in ensuring confidentiality in decision-making processes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Presidential cabinets face challenges related to the loyalties of cabinet members and the maintenance of secrecy. Because a president's cabinet members have different constituencies, including their department, political allies, and the public, their loyalties can be divided, potentially reducing their effectiveness in serving the president's agenda. Furthermore, the problem with maintaining secrecy arises partly due to the size and complexity of the bureaucracy in the Executive Office. The large number of unelected officials and the broad scope of operations make it difficult for the president to supervise everyone and ensure confidentiality. Additionally, the need for cabinet members to communicate with Congress, the media, and other stakeholders can lead to leaks and loss of secrecy, which undermines the collective decision-making process and the strategic objectives of the presidency.

While presidential cabinets are meant to assist the president in policy-making and implementation, they are often independent actors with their own agendas. For instance, Donald Trump's selection of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education led to significant policy changes within the Department of Education, demonstrating the individual impact a cabinet member can have. In contrast to parliamentary regimes, where cabinet ministers usually have a vested interest in supporting the prime minister due to their party alignment, U.S. cabinet secretaries are appointed for their expertise and can operate with a degree of autonomy that sometimes conflicts with presidential directives or lacks coordination with other governmental branches.

User Verve
by
7.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.