Final answer:
One argument suggests that it is morally permissible to kill animals for food based on the natural drives and instincts of humans, as well as the belief that humans have reasoning abilities to discern the laws of nature. While some may feel guilt, it is important to understand that life depends on things dying and it is neither inherently good nor evil.
Step-by-step explanation:
One argument that suggests it is morally permissible to kill animals for food is based on the idea that humans have natural drives and instincts, such as the need to eat, drink, and survive. These actions are in accordance with the natural law for species to survive and procreate, making them morally good. Additionally, the argument states that humans are animals governed by certain natural drives, and it is morally correct to take actions that further our health and life.
Another variation of this argument is based on the belief in a deity who created the laws of nature and obedience to these laws is morally correct. For atheists, the argument is based on the belief that humans have reasoning abilities to discern the laws of nature, and acting in accordance with these laws is morally correct.
While some may feel guilt for killing animals, it is important to understand that life depends on things dying, and it is neither inherently good nor evil. Just as we do not consider a cheetah evil for killing an antelope, humans can argue that killing animals for food is part of the natural order.