Question

Who is at fault for what happens, Sula or Nel? Or perhaps both? Explain.

Who is at fault for what happens, Sula or Nel? Or perhaps both? Explain.

Answer 1

Blame in complex human behaviors and moral dilemmas is nuanced and situational, involving factors such as personal responsibility and societal influence. Literary characters like Sula, Nel, Delia, and Nora demonstrate various degrees of agency in their respective narratives. Understanding their choices requires an intricate analysis of their context and decisions.

Step-by-step explanation:

When determining who is at fault for the events concerning Sula or Nel, one might consider various factors and perspectives. It appears that the question relates to complex human behaviors and moral dilemmas, which are often explored in literature. While analyzing these characters' actions and decisions, we can reflect on concepts of personal responsibility, the influence of societal norms, and the interplay of different characters' roles in a narrative.

In literary discussions, especially those involving characters like Sula or Nel, there is no definitive answer as to who is at fault. Both characters may have contributed to the situations at hand through their actions or inactions. Similarly, a situation involving a deity's responsibility for evil in the world or humans' unwillingness to accept responsibility for their own plights can also reflect the complexity of assigning blame. These scenarios demonstrate the nuanced nature of culpability in both divine and human contexts.

Assessing blame might involve looking at each character's decisions and the context in which they make them. For example, when Delia faces abuse from her husband in Zora Neale Hurston's story, her reactions and choices are essential to analyze when considering her share of responsibility for the outcomes. Likewise, when Nora in Henrik Ibsen's play faces moral and legal dilemmas, her decisions contribute significantly to the unfolding events.

Answer 2

Explanation:

Explanation: William locks Margot in the closet because the sun is coming out and he does not want her to see it.

The problem between Margot and the other kids is that she is from Earth and they have lived on Venus for all of their lives. They are jealous of Margot because she has seen the sun, and they do not remember the last time it came out when they were toddlers. Margot also does not relate well to any of the kids from Venus.

The appearance of the sun brings out the worst in the kids. They are very excited because the sun only comes out once every seven years.Margot has been on Venus for only five years. She remembers the sun, but the children cannot stand the idea. They have turned to bullying to deal with the situation, because Margot has not assimilated into Venus life. She does not play their games and has not made friends.The children do not really think about what they are doing when they put Margot in the closet. They make it a “joke” even though it is supremely cruel. When the sun comes out, the children simply forget about her in all of the excitement. They seem to have intended to pretend to lock her in there so she would miss the sun, but then they actually did it. This story is a good example of the pointless cruelty of bullying. If someone is different, then that person becomes a target. This is even more true with children, who are intolerant of uniqueness and privilege.