Final answer:
Macro approaches to understanding sports and social works, such as the Functionalist and Conflict perspectives, provide valuable insights into society's structure and power dynamics. These theories contribute to our understanding of sports as a form of societal performance that plays a significant role in cultural expression and youth development.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Functionalist perspective and the Conflict perspective are macro-level theoretical frameworks that sociologists use to understand societal dynamics, including those within sports and social movements. The Functionalist view considers how sports serve as a stabilizing force in society by promoting social integration and contributing to the maintenance of social order. For example, it might explore how institutions like sports respond to societal needs, such as providing escapism or promoting social solidarity.
Conversely, the Conflict perspective focuses on the inequalities and power struggles that exist within sporting contexts, emphasizing how sports can reflect and exacerbate social divisions. This perspective might examine the relationship between sports and issues like economic inequality or gender discrimination, as well as how sporting movements like the Tea Party and MeToo interact with and challenge existing power structures.
Sports as performance within these perspectives are linked to cultural expression and societal values. They provide valuable insights into the broader social context, from ancient Olympic games to modern athletic competitions, impacting youth development, identity formation, and socialization.