Final answer:
The most effective way to evaluate a new reading program would be to use a combination of pre- and post-tests to measure improvement in skills, and an analysis of student reading logs to track progress over time. Observations and surveys can provide additional qualitative data.
Step-by-step explanation:
The most appropriate assessments for evaluating the effectiveness of a new reading program in the classroom would include strategies that measure different aspects of the learning process. Pre- and post-tests to measure improvement in reading skills would provide quantifiable data regarding the students' academic progress. This is a form of summative assessment and offers a way to compare student performance before and after the implementation of the program. Analysis of student reading logs can track progress over time and provide insights into the consistency and depth of student engagement with the reading materials, acting as a form of formative assessment.
While observations of student engagement and surveys of student satisfaction can yield valuable qualitative data regarding student attitudes and engagement, they are more subjective and may not directly correlate with improved reading skills. However, they can serve as supplementary data to the more objective measures of skill improvement.
It is advisable to use a combination of these assessment methods to gain a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of a new reading program, as each type of assessment provides unique and valuable information about the students' learning experiences.