Final answer:
Reasons:
They may know why they are being questioned but can't assume.
Information needs to be admissible.
Right to remain silent.
Miranda caution/ caution against self-incrimination (right not to speak).
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's break down the reasons provided:
They may know why they are being questioned but can't assume:
This emphasizes the importance of not making assumptions during an interview or questioning. Even if the person being questioned has an idea of why they are being interviewed, it's crucial for the interviewer not to assume their understanding and to allow the individual to express themselves.
Information needs to be admissible:
In a legal context, information obtained during an interview needs to adhere to admissibility standards. This means that the information must be gathered in a lawful and proper manner to be considered valid and acceptable in a legal proceeding.
Right to remain silent:
Individuals being questioned have the legal right to remain silent. This right ensures that they are not compelled to answer questions that may potentially incriminate them. It is a fundamental right aimed at protecting individuals from self-incrimination.
Miranda caution/ caution against self-incrimination (right not to speak):
The Miranda warning is a legal warning that must be given to individuals in the United States before they are subjected to custodial interrogation. It informs them of their right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination and their right to legal representation. This caution emphasizes the individual's freedom not to speak if they choose.
In summary, the provided reasons highlight the need for careful and respectful questioning, the requirement for information to be legally admissible, and the acknowledgment of an individual's rights, particularly the right to remain silent and the caution against self-incrimination during legal proceedings.