Final answer:
Albert Speer's national pavilion design conveys a sense of power and authority, typical of Nazi monumentalism. Egon Eiermann's architecture, by contrast, represents a modern humanistic approach with transparency and openness. This shift reflects broader changes in architectural philosophy post World War II.
Step-by-step explanation:
The architecture of Albert Speer's national pavilion conveys power and intimidation through classic monumentalism, while Egon Eiermann's work depicts transparency, openness, and a more humanistic approach towards modernism. Albert Speer's architecture, closely associated with the Nazi regime, was designed to make an impression of grandeur and authority, often through massive, stern forms and rigid symmetry.
In contrast, Egon Eiermann's architecture after the era, imbued with the ideals of modernism, presented a more dynamic and flexible approach, often employing glass and steel to create lighter, more open structures that emphasize functionality and integration with their surroundings.
Through these contrasting approaches, one can observe the transition from the heavy, propagandistic style of the Nazi era to the lighter, more optimistic post-war modernism that aimed to express freedom and progress through architectural design.