Final answer:
The consistent statement with the OB anchors is that the field should rely on other disciplines for theory development, embracing the multidisciplinary anchor. Other statements do not align with the anchors such as contingency recognition, systems approach, and multi-level analysis in OB.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that is consistent with the four anchors of organizational behavior (OB) is: 'The field of organizational behaviour should rely on other disciplines for some of its theory development.' This reflects the multidisciplinary anchor, which acknowledges that OB should not exist in a vacuum but rather integrates insights from psychology, sociology, economics, and other fields to understand and manage workplace behavior effectively.
The other statements are not consistent with the OB anchors. Particularly, the belief that OB theories must apply universally ignores the contingency anchor, which holds that the effectiveness of actions often depends on the situation. Likewise, the view of organizations as machines operating independently of their external environment does not align with the system anchor, which recognizes the interdependence of internal and external organizational factors. Additionally, the perspective that each OB topic relates to only one level of analysis contradicts the multi-level anchor, indicating that OB topics should be considered at the individual, group, and organizational levels.