188k views
0 votes
The War Powers Resolution may be considered unconstitutional because

a. it was struck down by the Supreme Court
b. it violates the President's power to declare war
c. it violates the President's power as Commander in Chief
d. its use of the legislative veto may be considered a violation of the doctrine of separation of powers
e. it violates the congressional power to appropriate funds for the military

User Nghia Tran
by
9.0k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The War Powers Resolution may be considered unconstitutional because it violates the President's power as Commander in Chief and the congressional power to appropriate funds for the military.

Step-by-step explanation:

The War Powers Resolution may be considered unconstitutional because it violates the President's power as Commander in Chief and the congressional power to appropriate funds for the military. The resolution requires presidents to seek approval from Congress to continue any military campaign beyond sixty days, which some argue infringes on the President's authority as Commander in Chief. Additionally, the use of the legislative veto in the resolution may be seen as a violation of the doctrine of separation of powers.

User Jeanreis
by
8.1k points