Final answer:
In arbitration, incident reports are more likely to be discoverable than quality assurance reports.
Step-by-step explanation:
In arbitration, the discoverability of reports depends on the specific rules and procedures of the arbitration process. Typically, incident reports are more likely to be discoverable than quality assurance reports.
Incident reports are records of specific incidents or accidents that have occurred. They usually contain information about the details of the incident, witnesses, and any actions taken in response. These reports are considered more relevant to the arbitration process as they provide firsthand accounts of events.
On the other hand, quality assurance reports focus on the overall quality of products or services and are often confidential. They may contain internal evaluations, assessments, or audits of processes or procedures. While they can be important for internal improvement purposes, they may not be directly relevant to the arbitration proceeding and may not be discoverable.