Final answer:
Using an invented system and tools of measurement would lead to standardization issues and difficulty in communication, hindering collaboration among scientists. The development and standardization of units like the meter are crucial for consistent and comparable scientific measurements. Relationships between science and technology, as well as precision and accuracy of measurements, are also points of consideration.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a scientist invented their own tools and system of measurement, they might face several issues. The most significant problem would likely be standardization issues and difficulty in communication. In scientific research, it's crucial that measurements are standardized so that results are consistent and comparable across various studies and disciplines. Using a non-standard measurement system might lead to misunderstandings and make comparing results with those of other scientists challenging. This lack of common ground would hamper the collaboration among scientists, which is essential for the advancement of knowledge.
It's important to emphasize that the precise reason behind establishing a standard unit of measurement, like the meter, is to ensure that there is a uniform and globally accepted reference for scientific measurements. Changes in the definitions of our standard units occur to accommodate advances in technology and to improve precision. These revisions reflect the dynamic relationship between science and technology, where each continuously informs and drives the progress of the other.
The uncertainty in measurement is associated with both precision and accuracy, where precision refers to the repeatability of measurements, and accuracy is about how close a measurement is to the true value. Variations in these can lead to increased uncertainty in results.