Final answer:
Without specific information on the preferences of the Japanese interviewers, it is not possible to determine which story they like best. This answer would likely involve subjective literary reviews or the use of behavioral questions in interviews to predict future actions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The information provided does not specifically address which story Japanese interviewers like the best. Without further context or specifics about the interviewers' preferences, it is not possible to accurately determine which story they prefer. Typically, interviewers' preferences could be influenced by a variety of cultural, personal, and situational factors, and this kind of question might emerge during an interview where behavioral questions are asked to gauge the candidate's suitability for a job based on their past experiences and actions. However, in a literary context, this might refer to a review or critique of stories, which would likely be subjective.
If tasked with responding to a writer who thought their work was reviewed unfairly, it would be essential to engage in open communication, provide clear and constructive feedback, and ensure that the critique was fair and based on objective criteria as much as possible. This approach can help maintain professional relations and may lead to constructive dialogue and improvement.
Regarding Michiko Kakutani's methods to avoid appearing biased, it involves maintaining a certain level of objectivity and substantiating her comments with specific examples from the work. Success in avoiding bias would largely depend on the consistency of her reviews and transparency of her assessment criteria.