Final answer:
To respond to the Kingly Interpretation criticism, one should consider historical context, layering of texts over time, and engage critically with various interpretations, using them to enrich analysis and offer a more nuanced understanding of the work.
Step-by-step explanation:
Responding to the Kingly Interpretation criticism involves a multi-faceted approach. Literary criticism often operates on the principle that a work of art, like Shakespeare's Hamlet, is a layered text, influenced by various predecessors rather than solely the author's original creation. Critics may argue that interpretation should involve the consideration of historical context and the acknowledgement of various interpretations that add depth to the analysis. Additionally, criticisms such as those about King George III's 'tyrannical power' in the Declaration of Independence reflect the historical and cultural contexts which can amplify the text's meaning. When composing a critical response or drawing inferences, it is essential to consider the text's cultural assumptions and the possible range of interpretations, constructing or refuting arguments with thoughtful engagement with the work and its criticism. Engaging with other critics' interpretations can provide biographical insights and contribute to a fuller understanding of the text.