Final answer:
The statement that Methodists were methodical is true, the concept of predestination in Calvinist theology is true, and Puritan work ethic was based on predestination. Miller's principles reflect the lived and taught virtues consistent with these theological doctrines.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of Miller's principles aligns with a broader historical context of religious ethics and practices. Early Methodists were indeed recognized for their methodical approach to religion and life, so the statement that they were called "Methodists" because they were so methodical is true. In regards to the doctrine of predestination, it was a core belief in Calvinist theology indicating that a person's fate regarding salvation or d-a-m-nation was predetermined, making the statement true as well. The work ethic of the Puritans reflects these principles; they were expected to lead socially virtuous lives not to earn salvation but as a reflection of their chosen status. The teachings emphasized hard work, education, religious observance, and adherence to both secular and religious laws to maintain moral order and prevent decline, as seen in the convictions of influential Puritan leaders like Increase Mather and John Cotton.
The notion of separate spheres and the Cult of Domesticity, which is also addressed in historical studies, was indeed a way for the American middle class to distinguish themselves from the working class, suggesting that the statement is true.
The Protestant work ethic is indeed rooted in the concept of predestination, asserting that God has predetermined those to be saved, which aligns with option 'd' in the provided choices. The Puritans' commitment to their work and community, as well as their vigilance against the work of the devil, were driven by this belief and was a robust part of their societal contributions.