Final answer:
The transition to farming was not universally beneficial according to physical anthropology and bioarchaeology, as it resulted in changes in social structures and labor division. Some societies experienced a loss of leisure time and increased labor. Not all hunter-gatherer groups adopted agriculture, indicating that the benefits of farming were not universal.
Step-by-step explanation:
The transition to farming was not a universal benefit to humans according to physical anthropology and bioarchaeology. While farming enabled larger food production and population growth, it also brought about changes in social structures, labor division, and inequality. Additionally, the transition to agriculture resulted in a loss of leisure time and an increase in labor for many societies. Some hunter-gatherer groups chose not to adopt agriculture, suggesting that the benefits of farming were not universally advantageous.