Final answer:
Characters from different texts come to the conclusion of vanity by reflecting on their actions, recognizing the limits of self-admiration, and understanding how their behavior affects others. These characters' stories show various perspectives on vanity and self-awareness, which can be applied to deduce Jonathan's vanity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conclusion that Jonathan was vain is drawn based on various excerpts from different texts. The characters within these stories often reflect upon the nature of vanity and self-perception. For example, one character faces the realisation that vanity was at the core of their actions, as evidenced when a figure in the mirror is chided for being 'so vain, so shallow.' Vanity seems to be an underlying theme in the interactions and introspections of the characters, be it through Jane's embarrassment and realisation of self-respect, Kismine's lamentations over being attached to the men despite her family's practice, or Bernice's newfound self-confidence shaking her previous comprehension of popularity and attraction.
In one instance, a character delivers a stern admonishment to their own reflection in the mirror about their vanity. This act of self-critique highlights a moment of self-awareness and regret tied directly to their recognition of vanity. In another scene, when attempting to overcome challenges and win over a certain man, Jane finds that her respect for the individual makes it difficult to engage in mere coquetry, suggesting the limits of vanity and its impact on personal integrity.
Ultimately, it's the actions and thoughts of the characters, their growing self-awareness, and how they are perceived by others, that lead them to the conclusion of vanity, signaling an important lesson on the consequences and recognition of such a trait. Associating Jonathan with vanity could be inferred from the provided texts by recognizing similar patterns of behavior or attitudes that the characters express or encounter.