Final answer:
Potential whistle-blowers should first attempt to address the problem internally. Reporting the issue publicly should only be considered if the internal channels have failed or if the matter involves illegal activities. Addressing the problem quickly is not the most critical factor. Option b.
Step-by-step explanation:
Potential whistle-blowers should first attempt to address the problem internally. This means that they should try to report the issue to someone within their organization or institution. Internal reporting allows for the problem to be addressed within the system, potentially leading to a resolution without the need for external involvement.
Reporting the issue publicly (option a) may lead to unnecessary escalation and damage to the reputation of the organization before all internal avenues have been exhausted.
Addressing the problem externally (option c) should only be considered if the internal channels have failed or if the matter involves illegal activities that require intervention from external authorities.
Speed is important in addressing problems, but it is not the most critical factor in deciding how potential whistle-blowers should proceed. Therefore, option d, quickly, is not the best choice when considering the potential consequences and complexities involved in reporting misconduct.
Option b