Final answer:
Assuming the world is unjust and filled with evil engages with the philosophical problem of evil, which questions how a perfect deity could coexist with evil in the world. Philosophers like Leibniz suggest we do not have the perspective to understand how evil contributes to the best possible world. This debate centers around reconciling the existence of evil with divine attributes like omniscience, omnipotence, and omnibenevolence.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you are assuming the world is unjust and filled with evil, you are engaging with the philosophical problem of evil, a fundamental concern in theodicy and religious philosophy. The problem itself does not solely lie in the existence of evil, but rather in reconciling this existence with the idea of a deity endowed with absolute goodness (omnibenevolence), absolute power (omnipotence), and absolute knowledge (omniscience). The question becomes more enigmatic as it challenges the notion of why such a deity does not intervene to combat evil.
Various philosophical arguments suggest that evil and human suffering may be necessary components of the best possible world. Leibniz, for instance, argued that we lack the infinite perspective to understand how the evils of the world contribute to its ultimate goodness. If the universe is created by a perfect deity, then, paradoxically, what we perceive as evil may be an essential part of the highest good.
This leads to the concept that evil, as we understand it, may not exist as an independent force but rather as something necessary for the production of a world that is, in its entirety, good. The difficulty lies in human inability to perceive the universe as the deity does, seeing the full picture rather than isolated occurrences of suffering. Theological and philosophical discourse continuously explores these themes, attempting to transform our understanding of human freedom, evil, and the overall nature of reality.