Final answer:
The question seems to refer to legal principles of privity of estate, but the provided information pertains to historical legal decisions involving the Second Bank of the United States and rate regulations by Supreme Court cases.
Step-by-step explanation:
The case First American National Bank of Nashville v. Chicken System of America likely relates to issues of privity of estate, which is a concept in property law concerning the rights and obligations that run with the ownership of land. However, the other information provided seems to relate to historical cases concerning the Second Bank of the United States (BUS) and state-chartered banks. Notably, the Marshall Court determined the constitutionality of the BUS and the application of the 'necessary and proper' clause in its decision. Moreover, the importance of the BUS policy of demanding that state bank notes be redeemable in specie to control inflation is highlighted, as well as the case of Cincinnati, New Orleans, and Texas Pacific Railway Cos. v. Interstate Commerce Commission which addressed the concept of rate regulations and due process.