Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Suleiman's philosophy differs from absolution in Europe in several ways. Suleiman was the Ottoman Empire's longest reigning sultan, ruling from 1520 to 1566. During his reign, he implemented a number of reforms that had a significant impact on the empire's legal and political systems.One of the key ways in which Suleiman's philosophy differed from absolution in Europe was in his approach to justice. Suleiman believed in the importance of fairness and equality, and he sought to create a legal system that was based on these principles. In contrast, the absolutist systems of Europe were characterized by a strict hierarchy and a focus on the power of the monarch.Another key difference was in Suleiman's approach to religion. He was a devout Muslim and he sought to integrate Islamic principles into the legal and political systems of the empire. In contrast, European absolutist systems were often based on Christian principles and relied on the authority of the Catholic Church.Overall, Suleiman's philosophy differed from absolution in Europe in its emphasis on fairness, equality, and religious tolerance. He was a visionary leader who sought to create a just and inclusive society, and his reforms had a lasting impact on the Ottoman Empire and beyond.