Final answer:
The impacts of assumptions on beliefs about Psychology as a science are related to correspondence to reality, coherence with accepted truths, and empirical claims about the universe.
Step-by-step explanation:
Psychology as a science is impacted by three assumptions: the correspondence to reality, coherence with accepted truths, and empirical claims about the universe. The first assumption states that beliefs in psychology should correspond to facts and reality.
This means that psychological theories and explanations should align with observable evidence and be supported by empirical data.
The second assumption emphasizes the importance of coherence, meaning that psychological beliefs should be consistent with what has already been accepted as true. Finally, the third assumption deals specifically with empirical claims and how they are approached in science.
In terms of psychology as a science, there are different views on truth and its relationship to empirical claims. The instrumentalist view, also known as the pragmatist theory, focuses on the practicality and usefulness of scientific theories.
As long as the predictions of a theory can be verified and it works for the community of scientists, it is considered valid. The realist view, known as the correspondence theory, looks for true explanations that are supported by empirical testing. Lastly, the conceptual relativist view emphasizes coherence and consistency in theories.
In summary, the three assumptions – correspondence to reality, coherence with accepted truths, and empirical claims – play a significant role in shaping beliefs about psychology as a science.
They require psychological theories to align with facts and evidence, be consistent with existing knowledge, and approach empirical claims using various views of truth.