Final answer:
The idea that collusion is more successful in ongoing or uncertain games compared to those with a definite end is false. In longer or indefinite games, the sustainability of collusion is more likely due to ongoing incentives.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that collusion is more successful in a game that will continue forever or in a game with an uncertain ending time, than in a game with a certain ending time is false. This scenario can be likened to game theory, which suggests that players make different decisions based on the perceived duration and predictability of the game they are playing. In games with a certain end time, players might not have the incentive to maintain a collusive arrangement as the benefit from breaking the collusion increases when approaching the end. Conversely, in an ongoing game with no clear end, collusion may be more sustainable as the possible future gains from remaining collusive provide an ongoing incentive.
In the context of collisions in sports, we see that momentum plays a crucial role, and heavier equipment, such as tennis rackets and bats, benefit from increased momentum. This is unrelated to the principle of collusion but speaks to the physical aspects of sports and how different factors influence the outcome of sports events.