Final answer:
Without direct reference to Hakan Rydving's article, we cannot accurately state his objections to the cognitive science of religion. However, critiques generally involve considerations of cultural bias, methodological validity, assumptions on cognitive universality, and reductionism.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hakan Rydving's objections to the cognitive science of religion in the article "A Western Folk Mind?" are not directly referenced in the provided materials, which means it's not possible to provide a comprehensive response to the student's question based on the information available. However, typical critiques of the cognitive science of religion may include questioning its potential Western cultural bias, the validity and interpretive methods used to study non-Western cultures, the assumptions regarding the universality of cognitive processes, and the reductionist approach to complex religious phenomena.
It's crucial for a student or scholar to consult Rydving's original work or summaries of his arguments directly to understand his specific points of critique accurately. As cognitive science of religion is an interdisciplinary field, arguments and counterarguments are rich and varied, grounded in psychology, anthropology, philosophy, and religious studies.