Final answer:
The scenario provided accurately reflects a supervisor's role in a business setting, where they are in charge of checking work for accuracy and quality. For the question about displacement, without additional context, it's usually expected that not following directions will lead to different results in physics.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to be related to Business practices, specifically about the role of a supervisor in a workplace setting. When a supervisor asks an employee to review something again due to possible inaccuracies, it is indeed part of their responsibility to ensure that the work meets the required accuracy and quality standards.
In the second part of the question regarding displacement, without additional context, it is not possible to conclusively determine whether displacement would be the same if directions had not been followed correctly. However, typically in physics, if the directions are not followed correctly, it might affect the result, leading to an implication that the statement is false.