60.1k views
4 votes
What did the great British chemist *Michael Faraday* think of consistency?

A) He considered consistency irrelevant in chemistry.
B) He believed that consistency was unnecessary in the laboratory.
C) He valued consistency and maintained meticulous records in his experiments.
D) He thought that consistency hindered scientific progress.

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

Michael Faraday valued consistency highly, maintaining meticulous records in his scientific experiments which contributed to his significant advances in electromagnetism and electrochemistry.

Step-by-step explanation:

The great British chemist Michael Faraday certainly did not think consistency was irrelevant or unnecessary in his work.

On the contrary, Faraday valued consistency highly and maintained meticulous records in his experiments.

This approach to his scientific work was crucial to his success and to the advancements he achieved in areas such as electromagnetism and electrochemistry.

Faraday's rigorous experimental methodology and his careful recording of experimental details ensured that his discoveries, like the principles underlying electromagnetic induction, diamagnetism, electrolysis, and the naming of key electrochemical terms (e.g., electrodes and ions), were both credible and reproducible.

The correct answer that reflects Faraday's views on consistency is: C) He valued consistency and maintained meticulous records in his experiments.

User Groxan
by
7.3k points