Final answer:
The statement is false as many organizations have adopted virtual learning environments like Zoom to conduct classes and meetings effectively during the pandemic. Virtual and face-to-face learning share the element of student responsibility but differ in how student attentiveness is monitored and managed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that no organizations have yet figured a practical way to conduct classes and meetings from within a virtual learning world is false. Indeed, throughout the 2020 pandemic, numerous educational institutions and companies have pivoted to virtual platforms to continue their operations. Tools such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and various Learning Management Systems (LMS) have facilitated online learning and virtual meetings effectively. These virtual environments have enabled schools and organizations to conduct classes, meetings, and even conferences remotely.
While there have been challenges associated with virtual learning, such as access to technology and the need for increased student responsibility, virtual learning has been a critical alternative to face-to-face learning during times when in-person gatherings were not possible. The blend of synchronous (live) and asynchronous (on-demand) approaches has allowed students and professionals to continue their education and work remotely.
Comparing virtual learning to face-to-face learning reveals both similarities and differences. Both require a level of student responsibility, but they differ in how students can showcase attentiveness. In a virtual setting, attentiveness may be harder to gauge, but in face-to-face settings, body language can provide immediate feedback to the instructor.