Final answer:
True, if Web authors lie on the ICRA questionnaire, their site can get an inaccurate content label. Information on the Web lacks strict regulation and users must critically evaluate resources for credibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the Web authors lie when completing the ICRA questionnaire, their site can indeed receive a content label that doesn't accurately reflect the content of their site. This is true because information on the Internet is not regulated for quality or accuracy, and almost anybody can publish anything on the web. Hence, the onus is on the user to evaluate Internet resources critically.
To ascertain the credibility of online resources, one should begin by examining the author or the organization behind the content. It is important to assess their credentials, expertise, and any potential biases or agendas they may hold. This is critical in determining if the information presented is trustworthy and balanced or skewed by personal perspectives.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) checks factual claims about product performances to some extent, but not all online information undergoes such scrutiny. In advertising, while exaggerated or ambiguous language and images may be used, outright false particulars are not permitted. The principle of 'Caveat emptor', meaning 'let the buyer beware', is especially pertinent when evaluating claims on the Internet.