186k views
3 votes
Some work roles and some individuals are not well suited for telework opportunities. True or False

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

It is true that some roles and individuals are not suited for telework due to the nature of their jobs or personal circumstances. Factors like physical presence requirements, home environment, self-discipline issues, and increased overlap between work and family responsibilities can affect telework viability.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is true that some work roles and some individuals are not well suited for telework opportunities. Jobs that require physical presence, such as those in healthcare, manufacturing, and retail, cannot be performed remotely. Additionally, individuals may struggle with telecommuting due to a lack of a conducive home environment, issues with self-discipline, or the intensified conflict between work and family demands. For example, the Social Security Administration found that telework could lead to increased wait times and a backlog of work. On the other hand, positions in software development, writing, and customer service roles often lend themselves to telework.

Moreover, effective telework requires a certain type of management style and organizational support. For instance, organizations with a transformational leadership style may better accommodate telework as they focus on inspiration, individual consideration, and creating changes within the organization. Contrastingly, a Theory X management approach, which assumes workers are inherently lazy, will likely struggle with successful telework implementation.

User Yyfn
by
8.1k points
4 votes

Answer:it is true, Certain work roles, such as those requiring hands-on tasks or physical presence, may not be well suited for telework. Additionally, individuals who thrive on in-person collaboration or have roles that demand constant on-site presence may find telework challenging. It depends on the nature of the job and individual preferences and skills.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Icepopo
by
8.3k points