Final answer:
Cooperative-style coaches encourage athletes to make their own decisions, reflecting a contrast to laissez-faire leadership. Examples in the media of self-serving attributions by sports figures illustrate personal ownership in performance outcomes. Flat organizational structures and feedback methods also advocate for the agency and informed decision-making consistent with cooperative coaching.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cooperative-style coaches aim to encourage autonomy among athletes, prioritizing the development of players' decision-making abilities in relation to their performance. This approach contrasts with laissez-faire leadership, which is more hands-off and permits members to self-regulate without much guidance. For instance, in a sporting context, a cooperative-style coach might provide strategies and guidance but ultimately allow the athletes to make choices about their performance on the field.
In the media, one can find examples of sports figures that exhibit self-serving attributions for the outcomes of their games, attributing wins to their own efforts and losses to external factors like referees' calls. Furthermore, embracing individuality and self-reliance, as highlighted by Emerson, aligns well with the values promoted by cooperative coaches who encourage athletes to trust their instincts and personal judgments.
Modern organizational structures often promote flat hierarchies, which aligns with cooperative styles in that both encourage feedback across all levels and the formation of collegial relationships. The introduction of 360-degree feedback methods, while met with mixed reviews, suggests a need for reflexivity and discussion amongst employees and supervisors, which is compatible with the self-awareness and informed decision-making involved in a cooperative coaching framework.