Final answer:
The Harappan civilization's lack of lavish burials or monuments for leaders suggests that they were likely not pompous, focusing on practical city living and urban planning.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to whether Harappan leaders were pompous based on the available archaeological evidence. The statement that the art of the Harappan civilization suggests leaders were likely not pompous is true. There are no lavish burials or pompous monuments found in the archaeological record. Unlike their contemporaries in Mesopotamia and Egypt, Harappans did not build massive monuments or bury leaders in golden tombs. Instead, they focused on their lives on earth, as demonstrated by their urban planning, advanced drainage systems, orderly streets, and buildings with indoor plumbing, features showing a practical approach to living. The possessions found with the dead were relatively modest. Large-scale public works, like the Great Bath of Mohenjo-Daro, had a utilitarian purpose rather than serving as a testament to individual power. The lack of evidence for a powerful, centralized state in the Indus valley points towards a system of governance that may not have been headed by a pompous ruler class.