Final answer:
The problem with defining humans solely as tool makers is that it's not unique to our species, overlooks the complex nature of human intelligence, and ignores the significance of language and culture in our evolution.
Step-by-step explanation:
Defining Humans as Tool Makers
The problem with defining humans strictly as tool makers lies in the fact that this definition is not unique to human species. While humans are highly skilled at inventing, manufacturing, and using tools, it's become clear that other species also demonstrate the ability to use and sometimes even create tools. For instance, otters use stones to break open shellfish, and various primates, such as chimpanzees, as well as some birds, have been observed using and creating simple tools to assist with their daily needs. Moreover, the origins and advancements of tool making in human evolution are closely linked to the development of cognitive abilities and language, suggesting a broader context to human intelligence than tool-making alone.
Tool use is a part of a greater suite of behaviors that includes language and complex problem-solving, which also defines humanity. Our ancestors, such as Homo habilis and Homo erectus, showed cognitive planning in their tool-making process that resembles the mental capabilities needed for complex speech. Therefore, considering humans merely as tool makers overlooks the multifaceted and intricate nature of human intelligence and cultural evolution.
Additionally, the notion that tool-making is a defining characteristic of humans has been challenged by discoveries that many animal species demonstrate the ability to use tools. This has led to a reevaluation of what sets humans apart, which is now thought to be more related to the depth and complexity of tool use, the nuances of human creativity, and the advanced cognitive capabilities that allow for intricate language, culture, and civilization.